Posted: January 4th, 2017
After reviewing the presentation, compose a 2-paragraph response in which you address each of the following points: • In your own words, identify points in the peer review cycle that seem especially important and explain why. • How does an editor differ from a peer reviewer? Use at least two points to support your response. • Based on this information, explain whether your article for this week was peer reviewed? How can you determine this information? • As you work on your research in this class, where specifically can you look to find peer-reviewed information? General Peer Review Process: 10 Steps to getting a peer reviewed document into publication. Idea / Literature Review / Grant / Research / Interpretation / Conferences / Write Manuscript / Submit / Peer Review / Publication / Assignment (35 Points) • Two ‘Well Developed Paragraphs’ Response (11 points) / • Assignment questions answered in coherent manner (6 points) / • Explain if your article was peer reviewed/ how do you know this? (6 points) / • Where can you look to find further peer reviewed documents for your class project? (6 points) / • Mechanics/ Good writing (see our Syllabus for details on good writing). (6 Points) /
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.