Posted: September 21st, 2015
In 2005, the external auditor of Anasazi Corporation discovered three major frauds. The first was a $4 million theft of inventory that had been going for six years. The second was a $3 million kickback scheme involving the most senior purchasing staff. This senior purchasing staff had been allowing certain customers to overcharge for products in return for personal payments and other financial favors. The third was an overstatement of receivables and inventories by a subsidiary manager to enhanced reported earnings. Without the overstatement, his unit’s profit would have fallen far short of budget. The amount of overstatement has yet to be determined. All three of these frauds were reported in the financial newspapers and have been embarrassing to the company.
In response to these incidents, Anasazi’s Board of Directors demanded that management take “positive steps to eliminate future fraud occurrences.” In their words, they are “sick and tired of significant hits to the bottom line and negative exposure in the press.” Assume the management hired you, an accounting fraud examiner, to develop a comprehensive program to prevent future fraud in Anazazi.
Required
In developing your comprehensive fraud prevention program, describe clearly the roles the following Anasazi’s personnel will play in the program Refer to the various recommendations and guidelines on fraud prevention discussed in Chapter 3 and use the format below. An entry is made in the first row as an example to help you complete the rest.
Anasazi’s Personnel | Role in Preventing Future Fraud |
|
2.
3. |
|
1.
2. 3. |
|
1.
2. 3. |
|
1.
2. 3. |
|
1.
2. 3. |
|
1.
2. 3. |
SQ3-4)
How to Set Up a Whistleblowing Hotline to Prevent Fraud?
Wemade is a small publicly traded manufacturing company. Because of its small size, it is not cost effective to have internal control on proper separation of duties throughout the company. As a result, management knows that opportunities exist to perpetrate fraud within the company. Management is particularly concerned with possible collusion between purchasing officers and venders because of the relatively small size of the company and the fact that a single purchasing officer is often solely responsible for a vender’s account with regard to purchases of raw materials. Management figures that a lot of money could be saved by proactively preventing fraud and not just acting on a reactionary or crisis mode. As such, management considers establishing a whistleblowing hotline where employees can report suspicious activity.
Required
Questions You Would Raise at the Audit Committee Meeting |
Issue No.1: The design effectiveness of the whistleblowing hotline.
Question#1: Does the whistleblowing hotline have multi-lingual capability to support hotline callers with different ethnic backgrounds or that are calling from different countries? Question#2: Question#3: Question#4: |
Issue No2: Training employees and others about the whistleblowing hotline.
Question#1: Does employee training include issues related to the Sarbane-Oxley Act and address issues such as accounting irregularities, insider trading, improper loans to executives, related party transactions, and conflicts of interest? Question#2: Question#3: Question#4: |
Issue No.3: Evaluating communications received through the whislblowing hotline
Question#1: Are complaints of any kind involving senior management automatically and directly submitted to the audit committee without filtering by management or other entity personnel? Question#2: Question#3: Question#4: |
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1514A
Looking for the best essay writer? Click below to have a customized paper written as per your requirements.
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.