Posted: June 4th, 2015
Coursework assignment 2 – an individual written report worth 70% of your total module mark.
Curwen J and Slater R (2002) Quantitative Methods for Business Decisions, 5th ed, Thompson
(Referred to as C&S in the teaching plan)
Begg D, Fischer S, Dornbusch R (2010) Economics 9th ed. Mc Graw-Hill
Library reference: 330BEG/ 2103185961
(Referred to as B in the teaching plan)
Sloman J, Hinde K and Garrett D (2010) Economics for Business, 5th ed, FT/Prentice Hall
An Online version is available in the University
Library reference: 330.024658
(Referred to as S in the teaching plan)
The Economist www.economist.co.uk
Office of National Statistics (UK) www.statistics.gov.uk
Bank of England: www.bankofengland.co.uk
European Central Bank www.ecb.int
The Financial Times www.ft.com
International Monetary Fund www.imf.org
The following table is the teaching plan including the topics and references from the recommended texts.
|1||The market; demand, supply and price||B 3&4, S 4&5|
|2||Market structures and their measurement||B 8&9, S 11&12|
|3||Making sense of Data||—|
|4||Index numbers, correlation and regression||C&S 7&8|
|5||Probability, expected values and decision trees||C&S 8|
|7||Business objectives/ principal agent theory||S 3&14|
|8||The macro-economy and GDP||B19&20, S26,|
|9||The circular flow of money||B19,20&21, S26, 30|
|10||Inflation and Unemployment||B26&27, S 29|
|11||Supply side policies||B16&17, S18,20, 21&31|
|12||Assignment preparation and feedback|
Analysis of the Business Environment
Submission of Coursework
Unless explicitly stated otherwise in writing by the module leader, all coursework on this module is submitted via Blackboard only. It will automatically be scanned through a text matching system (designed to check for possible plagiarism).
Advice for Coursework Preparation
No need for “Executive Summary”, “List of Contents”, “Objectives”, etc.
Use Arial font type at size 11. Double-space each line (select “Format”, select “Paragraph” and change from “Single” line spacing to “Double”).
Have I provided a word count (select “Tools”, select “Word Count”)?
Have I numbered the pages of my assignment (select “Insert”, select “Page numbers”)?
The following is a guide relating to how the assignment will be assessed in terms of the mark awarded.
|80%+||An outstanding answer in every regard, with exceptional command of the material. Nothing more could reasonably be expected of the student within the constraints under which work was prepared|
|70 – 79%||An excellent answer with a high level of critical analysis, excellent referencing and evidence of wide knowledge of the subject, sound and original conclusions and high quality presentation.|
|60 – 69%||A sound answer to the set question showing good knowledge of the subject and displaying a well-rounded and critical understanding of the issues involved. Detailed mark depends on how well the criteria have been met and the standard of presentation|
|50 – 59%||The answer tends to be more descriptive than analytical and while the information is provided it is not always relevant to the question. A basic understanding of the subject is however still shown but there is little critical discussion. Again, detailed mark depends on how well the criteria have been met and the standard of presentation|
|40 – 49%||Some information and discussion relevant to the question provided, but the approach is muddled or incomplete. While some elements of the question are answered, the basic knowledge level is insufficient. However, in some cases, a pass standard could be reached with relatively slight improvement. In others, fundamental aspects of the question may be missed or major areas of the subject may be absent with no indication of a real grip of the issues involved.|
|Less than 39%||An outright fail due to failing to understand or answer the question set. The work provides little relevant information and is unstructured.|
Analysis of the Business Environment referral coursework (2014-15)
This assignment is worth 70% of the overall module mark
Q1: The recent fall in oil prices has been described as either a big tax cut or a contributor to potential deflation in the UK. Using the attached Economist article (15th Feb 2015) “British Monetatary Policy/ The Wrong Target?” as a starting point, evaluate both arguments and present your conclusions.
Q2: The UK supermarket sector has been described as oligopolistic. Show that this is true (or otherwise) by using appropriate concepts.
Oligopolistic markets often suffer from collusion. The attached article from the Economist (15th Feb 2015), “Guaranteed profits” suggests that price matching is a form of tacit collusion. Using this article as a starting point, research this and present your case.
Total = 100%
Word count limit Q1: 1750
Word count limit Q2: 1750
The answers should be in the form of a short report and should be quite separate, therefore they should include an introduction and conclusion but an executive summary is not required. Any charts or graphs should be in the body of the report and not in appendices.
The answers should be fully referenced (referencing may be either Harvard or “footnotes” in Word). You may include a Bibliography.
Both questions 1&2 require you to do your own research and to provide substantial original work in the answers. Quotations are acceptable but must not be extensive. Wholesale copying from texts (even when referenced or as quotations) will result in failure.
The assignment must be submitted electronically on Turnitin (same instructions as assignment 1).
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.