Posted: March 2nd, 2017

# Construct a formal proof for each of these arguments.

For each of the following arguments, adding just two statements to the premises will produce a formal proof of its validity. Construct a formal proof for each of these arguments.

1. W ⊃ X

2. YX

Therefore, W ⊃ Y

9.9 exercise 2

Prove the invalidity of the following by the method of assigning truth values.

Not (E and F)

(not-E and not-F) implies (G and H)

H implies G

Therefore, G

9.10 A Exercise 2

For the following, either construct a formal proof of validity or prove invalidity by the method of assigning truth values to the simple statements involved.

(E implies F) and (G implies H)

Therefore, (E or G) implies (F and H)

9.11, argument 3 —- in page 394.

For each of the following arguments, construct an indirect proof of validity.

1. (D v E) ⊃ (F ⊃ G)

2. ( G v H) ⊃ (D · F)

Therefore, G.

### Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away

Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.

## Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
\$0.00