Posted: November 30th, 2015
Description: 6-10 complete pages; typed, double-spaced; MLA format
Assignment: Contributing to an Intellectual Conversation
you are being asked to intervene more decisively in that conversation, to interpret one aspect of the debate and thereby contribute to a greater understanding of prejudices and representations of, specifically in the contexts of real- world media–advertising campaigns; magazine cover trends; film depictions; etc.
Using visual texts as your primary source, you will determine your own focus and direction of this project, perusing your own research interests here.
Some Tips to Get Started:
Work to identify a key claim or concept that you think can be applied as a lens to help analyze the details focused on in you visuals. This should be something you are interested in!
Criteria for Evaluation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sample Outline:
Introduction: Introduce
a lens – research about the topical issue. (use a form of the X, Y statement)
Body: Support
Conclusion: Close
Essay #4 Thesis Claims
Weak vs. Strong
A weak claim either makes no claim or is an assertion that does not need proving – an obvious interpretation that any viewer can spot. It is a fuzzy lens that will not help the writer (or the reader) be guided to a better understanding of the visuals. Most weak thesis statements suffer because they are overly broad (or not specific enough)
Weak: “The ads seem to be about deodorant, but are really about men and women.”
This claim is obvious and there is no interpretation and/or specifics – nothing to give the paper work to do – nothing to claim or prove. You may start with this and continue improving such.
A strong claim makes a claim about the visuals that needs proving. It provides the writer (and the reader) with a clearly focused lens through which to view the visuals.
Stronger: “The Old Spice Wolfthorn and Hawkridge ads seem to be about masculinity, but are really promoting socially accepted forms of heterosexual behavior.”
Try It:
After thoroughly analyzing your images, try completing the following X,Y statements as many times as possible until you arrive at a strong lens-based claim.
The _____[specify the visuals]________ ads seem to be about ____[initial interpretation]____,but are really about ____[lens-based interpretation]___.
While the _____[specify the visuals]________ seem to be promoting ____[initial interpretation]____,they are really selling ____[lens-based interpretation]___.
While the _____[specify the visuals]________ seem to be selling ____[initial interpretation]____,these images are really encouraging ____[lens-based interpretation]___.
The _____[specify the visuals]________ seem to be about ____[initial interpretation]____,but are really selling ____[lens-based interpretation]___.
A superficial viewer may believe the _____[specify the visual]________ to be about ____[initial interpretation]____,but a viewer who is familiar with [your secondary source(s)] would see the visuals as really selling ____[lens-based interpretation]___.
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.